waterbycounty
Federal water data

County water report

Capitol Planning Region Water Report

Drinking-water compliance, watershed health, monitoring records, and river conditions for Capitol Planning Region, Connecticut.

Water grade

N/A

Water score

N/A

State rank

N/A

Health violations

N/A

EPA SDWIS, 5-year lookback

Watershed impaired

66.7%

3 water bodies assessed

Monitoring sites

N/A

EPA Water Quality Portal

Live streamflow

79%

CONNECTICUT RIVER AT THOMPSONVILLE, CT

Water at a glance

Key Water Indicators for Capitol Planning Region

EPA SDWIS

Safety Grade

N/A

Insufficient data

EPA SDWIS

Active Violations

N/A

5-year health-based lookback

EPA ATTAINS

Watershed Health

67% impaired

3 bodies assessed

USGS NWIS

Streamflow Snapshot

79% of mean

CONNECTICUT RIVER AT THOMPSONVILLE, CT

EPA WQP

Monitoring Sites

N/A

Rolling 5-year window

Source: EPA SDWIS · Safe Drinking Water Information System

Drinking Water Compliance

Data center water stress

Capitol Planning Region has 1 facility in the DCWSI dataset.

ByCounty's DCWSI ranks this county #N/A nationally by combining its water score with mapped data center density.

DCWSIThe Data Center Water Stress Index: 60% the county's water-system stress plus 40% how concentrated data centers already are, scored 0-100. Higher means data-center density and water pressure overlap more here.

N/A

0-100 index

Facility count

1

0.0 density percentile

Discharge estimate

Not reported

EPA CWA fields where available

Water vs median

N/A

Compared with US county median

Mapped facilities

  • Ergonomic Group

    Glastonbury

    OSM
See the Capitol Planning Region data-center reportReview methodology

Data Center Water Budget Calculator

Estimate daily water use for a hypothetical facility in Capitol Planning Region.

1 MW1,000 MW
40%100%
799K gallons/dayData Unavailable

County-level industrial water use data is unavailable for this county. Contact the county water authority directly for industrial withdrawal capacity.

Based on USGS 2020 water-use data and EPA-standard cooling intensity constants. Not a substitute for site-specific water rights analysis.

Editorial analysis

Understanding Capitol Planning Region’s Water

Drinking Water Quality Overview

EPA SDWIS

Capitol Planning Region has limited drinking water data on file. Violation data are unavailable for this county.

Watershed Conditions

EPA ATTAINS

Under the Clean Water Act §303(d), EPA ATTAINS tracks whether waterways meet quality standards for drinking, recreation, and aquatic life (reporting cycle: 2022). A large majority — 66.7% — of assessed waterways are impaired (2 of 3 water bodies) across Capitol Planning Region's watersheds. The leading impairment causes are escherichia coli (e. coli) and flow regime modification. Impairment does not mean tap water is unsafe — it measures ambient waterway conditions upstream of treatment, not finished drinking water.

River & Streamflow Status

USGS NWIS

USGS NWIS gauge data (as of 2026-05-14T14:30:00.000-04:00) puts CONNECTICUT RIVER at 13.7k cfs — running somewhat below its historical average at 79% of mean. Streamflow is a leading indicator of drought stress, sediment load, and dilution capacity: low flows concentrate pollutants and warm water temperatures, stressing aquatic life and, in surface-water-dependent systems, the source water quality for treatment plants.

Editorial advisory

What the data suggests for Capitol Planning Region

Water Verdict

Capitol Planning Region does not have sufficient EPA SDWIS water quality data to determine an overall assessment. Residents should contact their local water utility for the most recent Consumer Confidence Report.

Violation Context

Health-based violation data is not available for Capitol Planning Region. EPA health violations occur when water systems exceed allowable contaminant levels or fail to meet treatment requirements. Residents should request the latest Consumer Confidence Report from their water provider.

Consumer Guidance

Drinking-water compliance data is not yet available for Capitol Planning Region in the EPA SDWIS system, which is common for rural areas and census areas served by private wells or small tribal systems. Residents should contact their local utility or state drinking-water agency for the most current Consumer Confidence Report. Using an NSF-certified filter (look for certifications against ANSI/NSF 53 or 58) can provide additional safety margin for any unconfirmed contaminants. E. coli is the leading impairment cause in Capitol Planning Region's watershed. A pipeline streamflow snapshot from the CONNECTICUT RIVER gauge is also available on this page.

Regional Context

State-level water quality comparison data is not available for Capitol Planning Region. When data is available, this section will show how the county's water quality compares to other counties in Connecticut.

Advisory text summarizes county-level public records and is not a replacement for your utility's current Consumer Confidence Report or direct local notices.

Contaminants & Resources

Key issues flagged in Capitol Planning Region's water environment

Watershed Impairment Causes (EPA ATTAINS)

  • 1

    E. coli (bacteria)

    Impairment cause per EPA Clean Water Act §303(d) assessment

  • 2

    Flow Regime Modification

    Impairment cause per EPA Clean Water Act §303(d) assessment

Source: EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycle 2022

Official EPA Resources for Capitol Planning Region

EPA How's My Waterway

Interactive watershed health data for Capitol Planning Region

EPA ECHO: Drinking Water Systems

Search water utilities and violation records for Capitol Planning Region

Consumer Confidence Reports (CT)

Annual water quality reports from utilities in Connecticut

Clean Water Act §303(d)

Watershed Health

Impaired Water Bodies

66.7%

2 of 3 assessed

High concern

Top Impairment Causes

  • 1

    ESCHERICHIA COLI (E. COLI)

  • 2

    FLOW REGIME MODIFICATION

Source: EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycle 2022

Impairment is determined under the Clean Water Act §303(d): a water body is impaired when it fails to meet state-defined quality standards for designated uses (drinking, recreation, aquatic life). Assessment coverage varies by state; counties without assessed water bodies are not shown.

Live USGS Streamgage

River & Stream Conditions

Current Discharge

13.7Kcfs

May 14, 6:30 PM UTC

vs Long-Term Average

79%

Below typical

Primary Streamgage

CONNECTICUT RIVER AT THOMPSONVILLE, CT

USGS site
01184000
Drainage area
9,660 sq mi
Long-term mean
17.4K cfs

One representative streamgage (the one with the largest drainage area in the county). Many counties have multiple gauges; this view summarizes the primary one. The long-term mean is the full-record annual average; the percent-of-typical value compares the latest reading against that average.

Free tool

Estimate Your Water Costs

Water Cost Estimate

3

3 people  ·  ~225 gal/day

Annual Total

$558

Monthly

$47

Water Bill

$558/yr

Filter Cost

$0/yr

Safety Grade for Capitol Planning Region:F — Failing

High violation count or severe watershed conditions.

Estimates use the national average residential water rate ($0.0068/gal, EPA/AWWA 2023) and EPA WaterSense per-person consumption baseline (75 gal/person/day). Actual bills vary by utility, usage tier, and local infrastructure fees. For informational purposes only.

Try the full calculator →

Capitol Planning Region has good water quality

Learn about water restrictions and conservation in your area.

Water Restrictions →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the water quality in Capitol Planning Region, Connecticut?
Capitol Planning Region, Connecticut has a drinking-water quality grade of N/A with a score of N/A/100, based on EPA SDWIS compliance data. Compliance data is currently unavailable. Watershed health, monitoring records, and streamflow snapshots are reported separately on this page.
Are there any water violations in Capitol Planning Region?
Violation data for Capitol Planning Region is not currently available. Health-based violations indicate instances where contaminant levels exceeded EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs).
How healthy are the watersheds in Capitol Planning Region?
EPA ATTAINS assessments under Clean Water Act §303(d) indicate 66.7% of Capitol Planning Region's 3 assessed water bodies are classified as impaired (2 impaired). The top reported causes are ESCHERICHIA COLI (E. COLI), FLOW REGIME MODIFICATION. Impairment means the water body fails to meet state quality standards for at least one designated use — drinking water source, recreation, aquatic life, or fish consumption. Note: watershed impairment doesn't always translate to tap-water issues; treatment plants can remove most regulated contaminants.
What's happening with rivers in Capitol Planning Region right now?
Capitol Planning Region's primary USGS streamgage on the CONNECTICUT RIVER has a pipeline snapshot of 13,700 cubic feet per second — 79% of the long-term mean of 17,352.87 cfs. Flow is within typical range for this gauge. For the latest gauge feed, visit waterdata.usgs.gov.
How does Capitol Planning Region water compare to the Connecticut average?
Capitol Planning Region's SDWIS water quality score of N/A/100 is not available for comparison.
Is tap water safe to drink in Capitol Planning Region?
Based on EPA SDWIS data, Capitol Planning Region has a water quality grade of N/A (N/A/100). Insufficient data is available to fully assess compliance. The grade speaks to the public water system, not the watershed — for watershed-level concerns, see the Watershed Health zone. For the most up-to-date information, contact your local water utility or review your Consumer Confidence Report (CCR).
Does Capitol Planning Region have clean drinking water?
Capitol Planning Region has no reported health-based drinking water violations according to EPA records. With a water quality score of N/A/100 and grade N/A, the county's drinking water has had some compliance issues but continues to be monitored. Note: drinking-water compliance speaks to the public water system, not necessarily to the watershed itself — check the Watershed Health zone for ATTAINS §303(d) data.
How is water quality measured?
WaterByCounty layers four federal datasets per county. The A–F drinking-water grade comes from EPA SDWIS (Safe Drinking Water Act compliance, 5-year violation lookback). The Watershed Health zone surfaces EPA ATTAINS §303(d) impairment data. The Monitoring zone summarizes EPA Water Quality Portal records. The Streamflow zone reports the latest USGS NWIS reading from the county's primary streamgage. Each is reported separately so you can see where the water is actually weakest.

Data Sources

Drinking-water compliance data from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) via the ECHO enforcement database. Scores reflect compliance history and health-based violation counts.

Watershed health and impaired-waterway data from the EPA ATTAINS Clean Water Act §303(d) assessments, state-reported and EPA-finalized.

Live streamflow from the USGS National Water Information System (NWIS), continuous discharge measurements from the largest-drainage gauge in each county, compared against the full-record long-term annual mean.

Disclaimer: This data is informational only. It is not health, legal, or professional advice. For concerns about your specific water supply, contact your local water utility.

By Evan Brooks, Data EditorUpdated Reviewed by Evan Brooks, Data Editor

Explore more data for Capitol Planning Region

Property TaxCost of LivingCrime RateIncomeHealthSchoolsDisaster RiskWeatherCounty Score