County water intelligence
Federal Water Records for Published Counties
Search EPA compliance, watershed assessments, monitoring records, and fresh USGS pipeline snapshots in one county-level view.
Enter a county, state, district, or page name to search.
Data center water status
166.02 GW mapped · 330 counties
Loudoun County, VA
AWS · Google
Maricopa County, AZ
Google · Meta
Polk County, IA
Meta · Microsoft
Franklin County, OH
AWS · Google
Crook County, OR
Meta
Licking County, OH
AWS · Google
Montgomery County, TN
Grant County, WA
Microsoft
Utah County, UT
Meta
A county-level lens where the AI data-center build-out meets the water map.
Compliance
EPA SDWIS
2,940
100% county coverage
Watersheds
EPA ATTAINS
1,470
50% county coverage
Monitoring
EPA WQP
2,916
99% county coverage
Streamflow
USGS NWIS
2,101
71% county coverage
Tracking records for 2,940 published US counties · 50 published jurisdictions
The Water Picture Your Utility Report Doesn't Show You
Every year, public water utilities mail a Consumer Confidence Report listing the contaminants they tested for. What those reports don't show is the broader picture: the separate watershed assessments, monitoring volume, and selected-gauge streamflow records associated with the county. A fresh USGS pipeline snapshot compares one selected gauge with its full-record annual mean; it does not identify a utility's reservoir or establish a source-water pathway. WaterByCounty brings four federal datasets — EPA SDWIS drinking-water compliance, EPA ATTAINS watershed assessments, EPA Water Quality Portal monitoring records, and USGS NWIS streamflow — into a single county-level view that anyone can read in under two minutes.
This site also fills a specific gap left when USGS WaterWatch, the longtime public dashboard for stream conditions across the US, was decommissioned at the end of 2025. WaterWatch gave millions of people a quick national picture of whether rivers were running high, low, or near normal. We carry that legacy forward at county resolution, pairing fresh NWIS pipeline snapshots against each gauge's full-record annual mean. Each snapshot keeps its observation timestamp and year and is not described as a continuously updated feed.
WaterByCounty is built for homebuyers researching a move, parents wondering about school water quality, journalists covering infrastructure, and policy researchers comparing compliance across jurisdictions. The data comes entirely from public federal sources — no proprietary scoring, no paywalls. Every number links back to an EPA or USGS endpoint you can verify yourself.
Prepared by ByCounty Editorial Team. Published by WaterByCounty. Editorial standards.
Four sources, one county view
The report separates tap water, watershed health, monitoring depth, and flow.
We normalize each source to the county level and surface the data that is actually reported. The Five-Year SDWIS Compliance Band stays tied to the recorded SDWIS rate; the other layers add context instead of pretending to be the same measurement.
Drinking Water Compliance
EPA SDWISRecorded health-based violations, the SDWIS Compliance Index, and the Five-Year SDWIS Compliance Band. Each is labeled as a historical county aggregation.
2,940
100% coverage
Watershed Health
EPA ATTAINSImpaired-waterway assessments under Clean Water Act §303(d), including what share of water bodies fail state standards and why.
1,470
50% coverage
Monitoring Records
EPA WQPCounts of water-quality monitoring sites and measurements from the federal Water Quality Portal, rolling 5-year window.
2,916
99% coverage
Streamflow Snapshot
USGS NWISFresh pipeline snapshot from the selected streamgage per county, compared against the full-record annual mean and labeled with its observation time and year.
2,101
71% coverage
Chester County
Pennsylvania
Five-Year SDWIS Compliance Band
C
Five-Year SDWIS Compliance Band
C
SDWIS Compliance Index
44.9
Recorded Health-Based Violations (5yr)
35
Recorded Violations / 100K Served
13.6 / 100K served
EPA ATTAINS · Clean Water Act §303(d)
Watershed Health Spotlight
Counties on opposite ends of the watershed-impairment spectrum, ranked by the share of assessed water bodies that fail Clean Water Act §303(d) quality standards.
Lowest recorded impairment shares
Minimum 8 assessed water bodies required for ranking inclusion to avoid distortion from small samples. Counties without ATTAINS assessments are not eligible.
USGS NWIS · Fresh pipeline snapshots
Rivers Running Far From Typical
Counties whose fresh pipeline snapshot is well above or below the selected gauge's full-record annual mean. These observations do not describe finished household tap water.
Running well above typical
Callaway County, MO
Auxvasse Creek near Reform, MO
Observation 2026
4277%
of typical
Boone County, MO
Hinkson Creek at Columbia, MO
Observation 2026
4107%
of typical
Duval County, FL
ST. JOHNS RIVER AT JACKSONVILLE, FL
Observation 2026
2741%
of typical
Santa Cruz County, AZ
SANTA CRUZ RIVER AT TUBAC, AZ.
Observation 2026
1888%
of typical
Running well below typical
Apache County, AZ
CHINLE CREEK NEAR MEXICAN WATER, AZ
Observation 2026
0%
of typical
La Paz County, AZ
BILL WILLIAMS RIVER NEAR PARKER, AZ
Observation 2026
0%
of typical
Maricopa County, AZ
GILA RIVER BELOW PAINTED ROCK DAM, AZ
Observation 2026
0%
of typical
Pinal County, AZ
GILA RIVER NEAR MARICOPA, AZ.
Observation 2026
0%
of typical
Fresh USGS pipeline snapshots from selected gauges. Each card includes the observation year; values refresh on the next verified data sync.
Interactive Water Intelligence Tools
Explore, compare, and analyze records for 2,940 published US counties: compliance, watershed health, monitoring records, and streamflow snapshots.
National Insights
Aggregated views: state rankings, impairment distribution, monitoring coverage, and streamflow patterns.
See InsightsWater Restriction Standards
Learn how to verify changing restrictions with the responsible utility or local government.
Review StandardsSDWIS Band Breakdown
Five-Year SDWIS Compliance Bands derived from recorded county rates.
Explore by StateHow the Five-Year SDWIS Compliance Band Works
The band is derived only from the recorded health-violation rate per 100,000 people served. Watershed assessments, monitoring volume, and streamflow are reported separately.
A
0–1 per 100K
B
>1–5 per 100K
C
>5–15 per 100K
D
>15–30 per 100K
F
>30 per 100K
Browse by State
Select a jurisdiction to view its published county water records.
Alabama
67 counties
70.2
Alaska
19 counties
14.0
Arizona
15 counties
27.0
Arkansas
75 counties
46.4
California
58 counties
44.8
Colorado
64 counties
37.7
Delaware
3 counties
68.3
District of Columbia
1 county
70.3
Florida
67 counties
57.3
Georgia
159 counties
65.4
Hawaii
4 counties
78.6
Idaho
44 counties
29.9
Illinois
102 counties
48.9
Indiana
92 counties
51.3
Iowa
98 counties
73.3
Kansas
57 counties
47.3
Kentucky
98 counties
65.9
Louisiana
63 counties
29.0
Maine
16 counties
32.1
Maryland
24 counties
45.8
Massachusetts
14 counties
72.2
Michigan
83 counties
55.4
Minnesota
87 counties
62.3
Mississippi
81 counties
51.2
Missouri
110 counties
50.4
Montana
51 counties
49.2
Nebraska
89 counties
56.5
Nevada
16 counties
54.4
New Hampshire
10 counties
35.9
New Jersey
21 counties
59.2
New Mexico
32 counties
18.7
New York
57 counties
48.6
North Carolina
100 counties
52.1
North Dakota
52 counties
69.9
Ohio
88 counties
54.6
Oklahoma
76 counties
15.2
Oregon
36 counties
42.4
Pennsylvania
67 counties
41.7
Rhode Island
5 counties
67.6
South Carolina
46 counties
68.0
South Dakota
53 counties
51.6
Tennessee
95 counties
73.1
Texas
221 counties
30.2
Utah
29 counties
47.0
Vermont
14 counties
44.6
Virginia
95 counties
58.5
Washington
38 counties
58.6
West Virginia
54 counties
34.8
Wisconsin
71 counties
36.4
Wyoming
23 counties
33.8
Highest SDWIS Compliance Index Values
Relative WaterByCounty comparisons derived from recorded SDWIS rates; not EPA scores.
Autauga County
Alabama
SDWIS Compliance Index
86.2
A
Bullock County
Alabama
SDWIS Compliance Index
86.2
A
Chambers County
Alabama
SDWIS Compliance Index
86.2
A
Cherokee County
Alabama
SDWIS Compliance Index
86.2
A
Chilton County
Alabama
SDWIS Compliance Index
86.2
A
Cleburne County
Alabama
SDWIS Compliance Index
86.2
A
Covington County
Alabama
SDWIS Compliance Index
86.2
A
Crenshaw County
Alabama
SDWIS Compliance Index
86.2
A
Why a Multi-Source Picture Matters
No single dataset tells the full story. A recorded compliance history and a watershed assessment are different measures. Streamflow can be normal while monitoring is sparse. WaterByCounty layers all four signals.
Recorded public-system compliance
EPA SDWIS records county-aggregated public-system violations for the stated source window. It does not establish current conditions for a specific utility or address.
The watershed itself
EPA ATTAINS, under the Clean Water Act §303(d), classifies water bodies as impaired when they fail state quality standards. This watershed assessment does not describe finished household tap water.
How much is actually measured
The EPA Water Quality Portal aggregates monitoring records from federal, state, and tribal sources. Monitoring volume does not by itself indicate better or worse water quality.
Fresh USGS pipeline snapshot
Fresh observations are compared with the selected gauge's full-record annual mean and retain their observation time and year. A pipeline snapshot is not a continuously updated reading or a tap-water safety measure.