waterbycounty

Alaska Water Quality

Drinking water data for all 30 counties.

Avg Water Score

19.8

State Grade

F

Counties with Data

22

of 30 total

County water atlas

Alaska water signals by county

A state-level 2.5D view across drinking-water compliance, watershed impairment, monitoring density, and streamflow snapshot context. Pin any county, switch layers, then use the lens controls to isolate clean systems, violation clusters, or impaired watersheds without leaving the page.

Counties

29

Avg score

19.8

Watersheds

21

ATTAINS counties

Monitoring

21

20 gauges

State atlas layers combine EPA SDWIS health-based violations, EPA ATTAINS 303(d) impairment assessments, EPA Water Quality Portal monitoring sites, and representative USGS NWIS streamflow gauges. Streamflow values are pipeline snapshots, not a real-time stream. County pages include the source-specific detail behind each layer.

Multi-source coverage in Alaska

Beyond Drinking Water

EPA SDWIS

22/ 30

counties with drinking-water compliance data

1,984 health violations statewide (5yr)

EPA ATTAINS

16.1%

avg impaired across 21 counties

43 of 501 assessed bodies impaired

EPA WQP

534

monitoring sites across 21 counties

130,431 total readings (5yr window)

USGS NWIS

20

counties with an active streamgage

7 above11 below

State atlas notes

What stands out in Alaska

County water quality is not one number. The strongest read comes from comparing drinking-water compliance against watershed impairment, monitoring density, and streamflow context. Use these signals as a starting point, then open any county profile for source-level detail.

Compliance spread

Yakutat City and Borough leads the state score table at 86.0/100, while Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area sits at 0.3/100. That is a 85.7 point gap inside one state.

Zero health violations

1

3+ health violations

19

Watershed pressure

The atlas impairment layer points to counties where assessed water bodies are most likely to miss state quality standards. Assessment density varies, so compare the percentage with the number of assessed bodies on the county page.

Highest current streamflow readings: North Slope Borough (955%), Fairbanks North Star Borough (347%), Matanuska-Susitna Borough (192%). High flow can reflect recent storms or runoff, not necessarily safer source water.

All Alaska Counties

CountyWater Score
Yakutat City and Borough86.0
Juneau City and Borough62.0
North Slope Borough53.7
Anchorage Municipality52.4
Fairbanks North Star Borough47.8
Sitka City and Borough33.3
Aleutians West Census Area16.8
Matanuska-Susitna Borough15.3
Southeast Fairbanks Census Area12.0
Kenai Peninsula Borough11.6
Haines Borough10.4
Denali Borough8.3
Kodiak Island Borough6.8
Dillingham Census Area6.2
Ketchikan Gateway Borough5.1
Aleutians East Borough3.4
Bristol Bay Borough1.4
Bethel Census Area1.2
Nome Census Area1.0
Lake and Peninsula Borough0.7
Northwest Arctic Borough0.3
Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area0.3
Chugach Census Area
Copper River Census Area
Hoonah-Angoon Census Area
Kusilvak Census Area
Petersburg Borough
Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area
Skagway Municipality
Wrangell City and Borough

Concerned about your water quality?

Berkey water filters remove contaminants at home.

Shop Filters →

Sponsored

Frequently Asked Questions

Which county in Alaska has the best water quality?
Yakutat City and Borough has the highest SDWIS water quality score in Alaska at 86.0/100 (Grade: A). Note: this ranking reflects drinking-water compliance only — watershed health, monitoring density, and streamflow are tracked separately on each county page.
Which county in Alaska has the most water violations?
Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area has among the lowest SDWIS water quality scores in Alaska at 0.3/100. See the individual county page for detailed violation history, watershed assessments, monitoring records, and streamflow data.
How healthy are Alaska's watersheds?
Across the 21 Alaska counties with EPA ATTAINS §303(d) assessments, an average of 16.1% of assessed water bodies are classified as impaired — 43 of 501 reported assessments. Impairment is a Clean Water Act designation that a water body fails to meet state quality standards for one or more designated uses.
What are streams and rivers doing across Alaska right now?
Of the 20 Alaska counties with an active USGS streamgage, 7 are currently flowing above their long-term mean and 11 are flowing below. Above-typical can indicate recent storm runoff; below-typical can indicate drought stress on source water. See each county page for the specific gauge and reading.
Is the tap water safe to drink in Alaska?
Alaska has an average SDWIS water quality score of 19.8/100 across counties with reporting. Individual county scores vary — check your specific county's page for compliance, watershed health, monitoring records, and streamflow snapshots.
What contaminants are tracked in Alaska water supplies?
EPA SDWIS tracks violations for regulated contaminants like lead, nitrates, bacteria, disinfection byproducts, and others. EPA ATTAINS captures broader watershed impairments including mercury, E. coli, sediment, nutrients, and PCBs. The Water Quality Portal aggregates monitoring records from federal, state, and tribal sources. See individual county pages for source-specific detail.
What's the difference between SDWIS, ATTAINS, WQP, and NWIS?
Each one measures a different layer of water. EPA SDWIS tracks drinking-water compliance — whether your public water system met federal Safe Drinking Water Act standards. EPA ATTAINS records §303(d) assessments — what share of a county's rivers, lakes, and streams fail state quality standards under the Clean Water Act. EPA WQP aggregates monitoring records — how many samples have been taken and what's being measured. USGS NWIS provides streamflow snapshots — how much water was flowing through the county's primary streamgage when the pipeline last ran. SDWIS speaks to your tap; the other three speak to source water and the watershed.
What does it mean when a water body is impaired?
An 'impaired' designation under Clean Water Act §303(d) means the state has determined the water body fails to meet its designated-use quality standards — drinking water source, recreation, aquatic life, or fish consumption — for one or more pollutants. Top causes nationally include mercury, E. coli (and other fecal indicator bacteria), nutrients, sediment, and PCBs. Impairment is a structural signal about the watershed, not necessarily about what comes out of your tap (treatment plants can remove or reduce contaminants before delivery).

Data Sources

Drinking-water compliance data from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) via the ECHO enforcement database. Scores reflect compliance history and health-based violation counts.

Disclaimer: This data is informational only. It is not health, legal, or professional advice. For concerns about your specific water supply, contact your local water utility.