waterbycounty

County water report

Cecil County Water Report

Drinking-water compliance, watershed health, monitoring records, and river conditions for Cecil County, Maryland.

Water grade

F

Water score

25.2

State rank

#24

of 24

Health violations

47

EPA SDWIS, 5-year lookback

Watershed impaired

40.3%

77 water bodies assessed

Monitoring sites

33

32,519 recent measurements

Live streamflow

33%

Octoraro Creek near Richardsmere, MD

Water at a glance

Key Water Indicators for Cecil County

EPA SDWIS

Safety Grade

F

Score: 25.2 / 100

EPA SDWIS

Active Violations

47

5-year health-based lookback

EPA ATTAINS

Watershed Health

40% impaired

77 bodies assessed

USGS NWIS

Streamflow Snapshot

33% of mean

Octoraro Creek near Richardsmere, MD

EPA WQP

Monitoring Sites

33

32,519 recent readings

Source: EPA SDWIS · Safe Drinking Water Information System

Drinking Water Compliance

Compliance grade

F

Based on EPA SDWIS compliance history.

Water score

Higher scores indicate cleaner recent compliance records.

25.2/100

Health violations

47

Health-based violations

Violations per 100K served

89.2

Population-normalized SDWIS rate

Editorial analysis

Understanding Cecil County’s Water

Drinking Water Quality Overview

EPA SDWIS

Cecil County's water systems carry a failing grade, scoring 25.2 out of 100. Over the past five years, EPA SDWIS records 47 health-based violations — a pattern that public water utilities are required to disclose and correct.

Watershed Conditions

EPA ATTAINS

Under the Clean Water Act §303(d), EPA ATTAINS tracks whether waterways meet quality standards for drinking, recreation, and aquatic life (reporting cycle: 2022). A substantial 40.3% of assessed waterways are impaired (31 of 77 water bodies) across Cecil County's watersheds. The leading impairment causes are temperature and phosphorus, total. Impairment does not mean tap water is unsafe — it measures ambient waterway conditions upstream of treatment, not finished drinking water.

River & Streamflow Status

USGS NWIS

USGS NWIS gauge data (as of 2026-05-14T14:45:00.000-04:00) puts Octoraro Creek at 78.8 cfs — well below its long-term average at 33% of mean — low-flow conditions worth noting for water-dependent ecosystems. Streamflow is a leading indicator of drought stress, sediment load, and dilution capacity: low flows concentrate pollutants and warm water temperatures, stressing aquatic life and, in surface-water-dependent systems, the source water quality for treatment plants.

Monitoring Network

EPA WQP

EPA's Water Quality Portal (WQP) aggregates monitoring data from federal, state, and tribal agencies. Cecil County has moderate coverage with 33 active monitoring sites with 32,519 recent measurements on record. Predominant monitoring categories include physical and nutrient. More monitoring sites generally indicate greater scientific attention to local water conditions — and provide the baseline data that regulators use to set future impairment listings.

Editorial advisory

What the data suggests for Cecil County

Water Verdict

Cecil County receives a poor water quality assessment with a grade of F and a score of 25.2 out of 100. The water supply has documented quality issues. Residents are strongly encouraged to use filtered or bottled water for drinking and to stay informed about utility improvement plans.

Violation Context

Cecil County has recorded 47 health-based violations, indicating multiple instances where federal contaminant limits or treatment requirements were not met. At 89.2 violations per 100,000 people served, this rate is high and signals significant water quality management issues.

Consumer Guidance

Cecil County has a Grade F compliance record with 47 health-based violations — among the highest levels in the country. Cecil County's drinking-water compliance score is 25.2 out of 100. The violation rate for Cecil County is 89.2 per 100,000 people served. Residents are strongly advised to use a certified NSF 58 reverse-osmosis filter or bottled water for all drinking and cooking until violations are corrected. Contacting the Maryland Department of Environmental Quality or Health can expedite utility compliance action. Temperature is the leading impairment cause in Cecil County's watershed. With 33 active water-quality monitoring sites in Cecil County, data coverage is strong. A pipeline streamflow snapshot from the Octoraro Creek gauge is also available on this page.

Regional Context

Cecil County has poorer water quality than the average county in Maryland. Its water score is 25.3 points lower than the state average, suggesting more challenges with contamination control or infrastructure than neighboring counties.

Advisory text summarizes county-level public records and is not a replacement for your utility's current Consumer Confidence Report or direct local notices.

Contaminants & Resources

Key issues flagged in Cecil County's water environment

Watershed Impairment Causes (EPA ATTAINS)

  • 1

    Elevated temperature

    Impairment cause per EPA Clean Water Act §303(d) assessment

  • 2

    Phosphorus (excess nutrients)

    Impairment cause per EPA Clean Water Act §303(d) assessment

  • 3

    Pcbs in Fish Tissue

    Impairment cause per EPA Clean Water Act §303(d) assessment

Source: EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycle 2022

Official EPA Resources for Cecil County

Clean Water Act §303(d)

Watershed Health

Impaired Water Bodies

40.3%

31 of 77 assessed

Moderate concern

Top Impairment Causes

  • 1

    TEMPERATURE

  • 2

    PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL

  • 3

    PCBS IN FISH TISSUE

Source: EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycle 2022

Impairment is determined under the Clean Water Act §303(d): a water body is impaired when it fails to meet state-defined quality standards for designated uses (drinking, recreation, aquatic life). Assessment coverage varies by state; counties without assessed water bodies are not shown.

Past 5 years

Water Quality Monitoring

Monitoring Sites

33

Active in the past 5 years

Measurements Recorded

33K

32,519 total readings

Most Measured

  • Physical
  • Nutrient
  • Microbiological

Categories measured most frequently

Data from the EPA Water Quality Portal (WQP), aggregating monitoring records from federal, state, and tribal sources. Each measurement represents a single sample analyzed for a specific characteristic (e.g., E. coli, pH, dissolved oxygen, nitrogen).

Live USGS Streamgage

River & Stream Conditions

Current Discharge

78.8cfs

May 14, 6:45 PM UTC

vs Long-Term Average

33%

Well below typical

Primary Streamgage

Octoraro Creek near Richardsmere, MD

USGS site
01578475
Drainage area
177 sq mi
Long-term mean
237 cfs

One representative streamgage (the one with the largest drainage area in the county). Many counties have multiple gauges; this view summarizes the primary one. The long-term mean is the full-record annual average; the percent-of-typical value compares the latest reading against that average.

Free tool

Estimate Your Water Costs

Water Cost Estimate

3

3 people  ·  ~225 gal/day

Annual Total

$558

Monthly

$47

Water Bill

$558/yr

Filter Cost

$0/yr

Safety Grade for Cecil County:CModerate

Some violations or watershed impairment detected.

Estimates use the national average residential water rate ($0.0068/gal, EPA/AWWA 2023) and EPA WaterSense per-person consumption baseline (75 gal/person/day). Actual bills vary by utility, usage tier, and local infrastructure fees. For informational purposes only.

Try the full calculator →

Improve your water quality at home

Berkey filters remove 99.9%+ of contaminants from tap water.

Shop Berkey →

Sponsored

Test your tap water

Tap Score provides professional mail-in water testing.

Get Tested →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the water quality in Cecil County, Maryland?
Cecil County, Maryland has a drinking-water quality grade of F with a score of 25.2/100, based on EPA SDWIS compliance data. The county has 47 health-based drinking water violations over the past 5 years. Watershed health, monitoring records, and streamflow snapshots are reported separately on this page.
Are there any water violations in Cecil County?
Cecil County has 47 health-based drinking water violations recorded by the EPA over the past 5 years. Health-based violations indicate instances where contaminant levels exceeded EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs). Violations may have been resolved — check with your local water utility for current status.
How healthy are the watersheds in Cecil County?
EPA ATTAINS assessments under Clean Water Act §303(d) indicate 40.3% of Cecil County's 77 assessed water bodies are classified as impaired (31 impaired). The top reported causes are TEMPERATURE, PHOSPHORUS, TOTAL, PCBS IN FISH TISSUE. Impairment means the water body fails to meet state quality standards for at least one designated use — drinking water source, recreation, aquatic life, or fish consumption. Note: watershed impairment doesn't always translate to tap-water issues; treatment plants can remove most regulated contaminants.
How much water-quality monitoring happens in Cecil County?
EPA's Water Quality Portal records 32,519 measurements from 33 monitoring sites in Cecil County over the past five years. The most frequently measured characteristic groups are Physical, Nutrient, Microbiological. Each measurement is a single sample analyzed for one characteristic (E. coli, pH, dissolved oxygen, etc.). High monitoring density means more scientific evidence behind any reported signal — it does not by itself indicate water quality.
What's happening with rivers in Cecil County right now?
Cecil County's primary USGS streamgage on the Octoraro Creek has a pipeline snapshot of 78.8 cubic feet per second — 33% of the long-term mean of 237.02 cfs. This is well below typical — often a signal of drought stress on source water. For the latest gauge feed, visit waterdata.usgs.gov.
How does Cecil County water compare to the Maryland average?
Cecil County's SDWIS water quality score of 25.2/100 is lower than the Maryland state average of 50.5. The average water quality grade across Maryland is D, based on data from 24 counties with available SDWIS data.
Is tap water safe to drink in Cecil County?
Based on EPA SDWIS data, Cecil County has a water quality grade of F (25.2/100). This indicates below-average compliance with significant violations. Residents may want to consider home water filtration or independent testing. The grade speaks to the public water system, not the watershed — for watershed-level concerns, see the Watershed Health zone. For the most up-to-date information, contact your local water utility or review your Consumer Confidence Report (CCR).
Why does Cecil County have so many water violations?
Cecil County has 47 health-based drinking water violations on record from the EPA SDWIS database. A higher violation count can result from aging infrastructure, underfunded water utilities, agricultural runoff contamination, or industrial pollution. Counties with more water systems may also see more violations simply due to scale. Residents concerned about water quality should consider independent water testing and home filtration systems.
How does Cecil County rank for water quality in Maryland?
Cecil County ranks #24 out of 24 counties in Maryland by SDWIS water quality score (1 = best). With a score of 25.2/100, it falls in the bottom third of counties statewide. The ranking reflects EPA SDWIS compliance only — not watershed impairment, monitoring density, or streamflow, which are tracked separately on this page.

Data Sources

Drinking-water compliance data from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) via the ECHO enforcement database. Scores reflect compliance history and health-based violation counts.

Watershed health and impaired-waterway data from the EPA ATTAINS Clean Water Act §303(d) assessments, state-reported and EPA-finalized.

Water-quality monitoring counts from the EPA Water Quality Portal (WQP), federated USGS, EPA, and state agency sampling records over a rolling 5-year window.

Live streamflow from the USGS National Water Information System (NWIS), continuous discharge measurements from the largest-drainage gauge in each county, compared against the full-record long-term annual mean.

Disclaimer: This data is informational only. It is not health, legal, or professional advice. For concerns about your specific water supply, contact your local water utility.

By Evan Brooks, Data EditorUpdated Reviewed by Evan Brooks, Data Editor