waterbycounty

County water report

Tulsa County Water Report

Drinking-water compliance, watershed health, monitoring records, and river conditions for Tulsa County, Oklahoma.

Water grade

A

Water score

70.4

State rank

#3

of 77

Health violations

5

EPA SDWIS, 5-year lookback

Watershed impaired

100.0%

4 water bodies assessed

Monitoring sites

8

9,891 recent measurements

Live streamflow

122%

Arkansas River at Tulsa, OK

Water at a glance

Key Water Indicators for Tulsa County

EPA SDWIS

Safety Grade

A

Score: 70.4 / 100

EPA SDWIS

Active Violations

5

5-year health-based lookback

EPA ATTAINS

Watershed Health

100% impaired

4 bodies assessed

USGS NWIS

Streamflow Snapshot

122% of mean

Arkansas River at Tulsa, OK

EPA WQP

Monitoring Sites

8

9,891 recent readings

Source: EPA SDWIS · Safe Drinking Water Information System

Drinking Water Compliance

Compliance grade

A

Based on EPA SDWIS compliance history.

Water score

Higher scores indicate cleaner recent compliance records.

70.4/100

Health violations

5

Health-based violations

Violations per 100K served

0.8

Population-normalized SDWIS rate

Data center water stress

Tulsa County has 12 facilities in the DCWSI dataset.

ByCounty's DCWSI ranks this county #43 nationally by combining its water score with mapped data center density.

DCWSIThe Data Center Water Stress Index: 60% the county's water-system stress plus 40% how concentrated data centers already are, scored 0-100. Higher means data-center density and water pressure overlap more here.

77.9

0-100 index

Facility count

12

89.1 density percentile

Discharge estimate

Not reported

EPA CWA fields where available

Water vs median

+20.4

Compared with US county median

Mapped facilities

  • BP AMOCO / 512 S CINCINNATI AVE SHARED SVC CTR

    TULSA

    EPA ECHO
  • Cherokee Data Center

    Tulsa

    OSM
  • DXC TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LLC / CHEROKEE DATA CENTER

    TULSA

    EPA ECHO
  • DXC TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LLC / DXC TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LLC

    TULSA

    EPA ECHO
  • OCOSA

    Facility details limited

    OSM
  • OpenStreetMap data center 946014659

    Facility details limited

    OSM

6 more mapped facilities included in the county score.

Data Center Water Budget Calculator

Estimate daily water use for a hypothetical facility in Tulsa County.

1 MW1,000 MW
40%100%
799K gallons/dayHigh Impact

Your facility would use 28.6% of this county's industrial water baseline. Verify water rights and long-term drought projections before committing.

28.6% of county industrial baseline2.00 Mgal/day remaining headroom

Based on USGS 2020 water-use data and EPA-standard cooling intensity constants. Not a substitute for site-specific water rights analysis.

Editorial analysis

Understanding Tulsa County’s Water

Drinking Water Quality Overview

EPA SDWIS

Tulsa County earns an A grade for drinking water quality, scoring 70.4 out of 100. Over the past five years, EPA SDWIS records 5 health-based violations — a pattern that public water utilities are required to disclose and correct.

Watershed Conditions

EPA ATTAINS

Under the Clean Water Act §303(d), EPA ATTAINS tracks whether waterways meet quality standards for drinking, recreation, and aquatic life (reporting cycle: 2022). A large majority — 100.0% — of assessed waterways are impaired (4 of 4 water bodies) across Tulsa County's watersheds. The leading impairment causes are turbidity and fish bioassessments. Impairment does not mean tap water is unsafe — it measures ambient waterway conditions upstream of treatment, not finished drinking water.

River & Streamflow Status

USGS NWIS

USGS NWIS gauge data (as of 2025-11-29T00:30:00.000-06:00) puts Arkansas River at 10.2k cfs — flowing above its historical average at 122% of mean. Streamflow is a leading indicator of drought stress, sediment load, and dilution capacity: low flows concentrate pollutants and warm water temperatures, stressing aquatic life and, in surface-water-dependent systems, the source water quality for treatment plants.

Monitoring Network

EPA WQP

EPA's Water Quality Portal (WQP) aggregates monitoring data from federal, state, and tribal agencies. Tulsa County has limited coverage with 8 active monitoring sites with 9,891 recent measurements on record. Predominant monitoring categories include not assigned and physical. More monitoring sites generally indicate greater scientific attention to local water conditions — and provide the baseline data that regulators use to set future impairment listings.

Editorial advisory

What the data suggests for Tulsa County

Water Verdict

Tulsa County receives a good water quality assessment with a grade of A and a score of 70.4 out of 100. While the water supply is generally safe, occasional monitoring gaps or minor contaminant detections may occur.

Violation Context

Tulsa County has recorded 5 health-based violations, indicating multiple instances where federal contaminant limits or treatment requirements were not met. At 0.8 violations per 100,000 people served, this rate is relatively low compared to many U.S. counties.

Consumer Guidance

Tap water compliance data for Tulsa County shows a A grade. Tulsa County's drinking-water compliance score is 70.4 out of 100. Reviewing your utility's most recent Consumer Confidence Report provides the most accurate picture of detected contaminants and treatment status. An NSF-certified water filter can add an extra layer of safety for any household concerns. Turbidity is the leading impairment cause in Tulsa County's watershed. A pipeline streamflow snapshot from the Arkansas River gauge is also available on this page.

Regional Context

Tulsa County has better water quality than the average county in Oklahoma. Its water score is 54.6 points higher than the state average, indicating stronger water system performance relative to neighboring counties.

Advisory text summarizes county-level public records and is not a replacement for your utility's current Consumer Confidence Report or direct local notices.

Contaminants & Resources

Key issues flagged in Tulsa County's water environment

Watershed Impairment Causes (EPA ATTAINS)

  • 1

    High turbidity

    Impairment cause per EPA Clean Water Act §303(d) assessment

  • 2

    Fish Bioassessments

    Impairment cause per EPA Clean Water Act §303(d) assessment

Source: EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycle 2022

Official EPA Resources for Tulsa County

Clean Water Act §303(d)

Watershed Health

Impaired Water Bodies

100.0%

4 of 4 assessed

High concern

Top Impairment Causes

  • 1

    TURBIDITY

  • 2

    FISH BIOASSESSMENTS

Source: EPA ATTAINS · Reporting cycle 2022

Impairment is determined under the Clean Water Act §303(d): a water body is impaired when it fails to meet state-defined quality standards for designated uses (drinking, recreation, aquatic life). Assessment coverage varies by state; counties without assessed water bodies are not shown.

Past 5 years

Water Quality Monitoring

Monitoring Sites

8

Active in the past 5 years

Measurements Recorded

9.9K

9,891 total readings

Most Measured

  • Not Assigned
  • Physical
  • Biological, Algae, Phytoplankton

Categories measured most frequently

Data from the EPA Water Quality Portal (WQP), aggregating monitoring records from federal, state, and tribal sources. Each measurement represents a single sample analyzed for a specific characteristic (e.g., E. coli, pH, dissolved oxygen, nitrogen).

Live USGS Streamgage

River & Stream Conditions

Current Discharge

10.2Kcfs

Nov 29, 6:30 AM UTC

vs Long-Term Average

122%

Above typical

Primary Streamgage

Arkansas River at Tulsa, OK

USGS site
07164500
Drainage area
74,460 sq mi
Long-term mean
8,376 cfs

One representative streamgage (the one with the largest drainage area in the county). Many counties have multiple gauges; this view summarizes the primary one. The long-term mean is the full-record annual average; the percent-of-typical value compares the latest reading against that average.

Free tool

Estimate Your Water Costs

Water Cost Estimate

3

3 people  ·  ~225 gal/day

Annual Total

$558

Monthly

$47

Water Bill

$558/yr

Filter Cost

$0/yr

Safety Grade for Tulsa County:CModerate

Some violations or watershed impairment detected.

Estimates use the national average residential water rate ($0.0068/gal, EPA/AWWA 2023) and EPA WaterSense per-person consumption baseline (75 gal/person/day). Actual bills vary by utility, usage tier, and local infrastructure fees. For informational purposes only.

Try the full calculator →

Improve your water quality at home

Berkey filters remove 99.9%+ of contaminants from tap water.

Shop Berkey →

Sponsored

Test your tap water

Tap Score provides professional mail-in water testing.

Get Tested →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the water quality in Tulsa County, Oklahoma?
Tulsa County, Oklahoma has a drinking-water quality grade of A with a score of 70.4/100, based on EPA SDWIS compliance data. The county has 5 health-based drinking water violations over the past 5 years. Watershed health, monitoring records, and streamflow snapshots are reported separately on this page.
Are there any water violations in Tulsa County?
Tulsa County has 5 health-based drinking water violations recorded by the EPA over the past 5 years. Health-based violations indicate instances where contaminant levels exceeded EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs). Violations may have been resolved — check with your local water utility for current status.
How healthy are the watersheds in Tulsa County?
EPA ATTAINS assessments under Clean Water Act §303(d) indicate 100.0% of Tulsa County's 4 assessed water bodies are classified as impaired (4 impaired). The top reported causes are TURBIDITY, FISH BIOASSESSMENTS. Impairment means the water body fails to meet state quality standards for at least one designated use — drinking water source, recreation, aquatic life, or fish consumption. Note: watershed impairment doesn't always translate to tap-water issues; treatment plants can remove most regulated contaminants.
How much water-quality monitoring happens in Tulsa County?
EPA's Water Quality Portal records 9,891 measurements from 8 monitoring sites in Tulsa County over the past five years. The most frequently measured characteristic groups are Not Assigned, Physical, Biological, Algae, Phytoplankton. Each measurement is a single sample analyzed for one characteristic (E. coli, pH, dissolved oxygen, etc.). High monitoring density means more scientific evidence behind any reported signal — it does not by itself indicate water quality.
What's happening with rivers in Tulsa County right now?
Tulsa County's primary USGS streamgage on the Arkansas River has a pipeline snapshot of 10,200 cubic feet per second — 122% of the long-term mean of 8,376.27 cfs. Flow is within typical range for this gauge. For the latest gauge feed, visit waterdata.usgs.gov.
How does Tulsa County water compare to the Oklahoma average?
Tulsa County's SDWIS water quality score of 70.4/100 is higher than the Oklahoma state average of 15.8. The average water quality grade across Oklahoma is F, based on data from 77 counties with available SDWIS data.
Is tap water safe to drink in Tulsa County?
Based on EPA SDWIS data, Tulsa County has a water quality grade of A (70.4/100). This indicates good to excellent water quality with strong SDWIS compliance. The grade speaks to the public water system, not the watershed — for watershed-level concerns, see the Watershed Health zone. For the most up-to-date information, contact your local water utility or review your Consumer Confidence Report (CCR).
Does Tulsa County have clean drinking water?
Tulsa County has 5 health-based drinking water violations according to EPA records. With a water quality score of 70.4/100 and grade A, the county's drinking water has had some compliance issues but continues to be monitored. Note: drinking-water compliance speaks to the public water system, not necessarily to the watershed itself — check the Watershed Health zone for ATTAINS §303(d) data.
How does Tulsa County rank for water quality in Oklahoma?
Tulsa County ranks #3 out of 77 counties in Oklahoma by SDWIS water quality score (1 = best). With a score of 70.4/100, it falls in the top third of counties statewide. The ranking reflects EPA SDWIS compliance only — not watershed impairment, monitoring density, or streamflow, which are tracked separately on this page.

Data Sources

Drinking-water compliance data from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) via the ECHO enforcement database. Scores reflect compliance history and health-based violation counts.

Watershed health and impaired-waterway data from the EPA ATTAINS Clean Water Act §303(d) assessments, state-reported and EPA-finalized.

Water-quality monitoring counts from the EPA Water Quality Portal (WQP), federated USGS, EPA, and state agency sampling records over a rolling 5-year window.

Live streamflow from the USGS National Water Information System (NWIS), continuous discharge measurements from the largest-drainage gauge in each county, compared against the full-record long-term annual mean.

Disclaimer: This data is informational only. It is not health, legal, or professional advice. For concerns about your specific water supply, contact your local water utility.

By Evan Brooks, Data EditorUpdated Reviewed by Evan Brooks, Data Editor